<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- generator="pyblosxom/1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"

xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/html"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <channel>
    <title>Tolimar's blog</title>
    <link>http://blog.schmehl.info</link>
    <description>Alexander <q>Tolimar</q> Reichle-Schmehl lives in Hildesheim / Germany.  He's an official Debian Developer.  Beside maintaining various <a href="http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=tolimar@debian.org">packages</a>, his main task is being spokesman and event organizer of the Debian project.</description>
    <!--pubDate></pubDate-->
    <generator>pyblosxom 1.2</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <item>
      <title>Release Critical Bug report for Week 34</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-34</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-34</comments-->
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian/rc-stats</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-34</guid>
      <description>
              
The <a href="http://bts.turmzimmer.net/">unofficial rc bug tracker</a>
currently knows about the following bugs:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>In Total:</th><td>390</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Affecting Squeeze:</th><td>299</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Squeeze only:</th><td>82</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Remaining to be fixed in Squeeze:</th><td><b>217</b></td></tr>
</table>

<p>Of these <b>217</b> bugs, the following tags are set:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>Pending in Squeeze:</th><td>18</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Patched in Squeeze:</th><td>35</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Duplicates in Squeeze:</th><td>21</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Contrib or non-free in Squeeze:</th><td>14</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Claimed in Squeeze:</th><td>3</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Delayed in Squeeze:</th><td>10</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Can fixed in a security Update:</th><td>13</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Otherwise fixed in Squeeze:</th><td>17</td></tr>
</table>

<p>Ignoring all the above (multiple tags possible), <b>126</b>
bugs need to be fixed by Debian Contributers to get Debian 6.0 <q>Squeeze</q> released.</p>

<p>However, with the view of the Release Managers, <b>245</b> need
to be dealt with for the release to happen.</p>

<p>Please see <a
href="http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/releasing-squeeze-6">my older
post</a> for an explanation of the different numbers.

      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/rc-stats/2010-34?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Release Critical Bug report for Week 33</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-33</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-33</comments-->
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian/rc-stats</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-33</guid>
      <description>
              
The <a href="http://bts.turmzimmer.net/">unofficial rc bug tracker</a>
currently knows about the following bugs:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>In Total:</th><td>401</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Affecting Squeeze:</th><td>302</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Squeeze only:</th><td>83</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Remaining to be fixed in Squeeze:</th><td><b>219</b></td></tr>
</table>

<p>Of these <b>219</b> bugs, the following tags are set:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>Pending in Squeeze:</th><td>18</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Patched in Squeeze:</th><td>43</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Duplicates in Squeeze:</th><td>21</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Contrib or non-free in Squeeze:</th><td>15</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Claimed in Squeeze:</th><td>2</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Delayed in Squeeze:</th><td>13</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Can fixed in a security Update:</th><td>10</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Otherwise fixed in Squeeze:</th><td>19</td></tr>
</table>

<p>Ignoring all the above (multiple tags possible), <b>128</b>
bugs need to be fixed by Debian Contributers to get Debian 6.0 <q>Squeeze</q> released.</p>

<p>However, with the view of the Release Managers, <b>243</b> need
to be dealt with for the release to happen.</p>

<p>Please see <a
href="http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/releasing-squeeze-6">my older
post</a> for an explanation of the different numbers.

      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/rc-stats/2010-33?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Release Critical Bug report for Week 32</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-32</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-32</comments-->
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 13:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian/rc-stats</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-32</guid>
      <description>
              
The <a href="http://bts.turmzimmer.net/">unofficial rc bug tracker</a>
currently knows about the following bugs:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>In Total:</th><td>448</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Affecting Squeeze:</th><td>329</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Squeeze only:</th><td>108</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Remaining to be fixed in Squeeze:</th><td><b>221</b></td></tr>
</table>

<p>Of these <b>221</b> bugs, the following tags are set:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>Pending in Squeeze:</th><td>24</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Patched in Squeeze:</th><td>43</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Duplicates in Squeeze:</th><td>19</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Contrib or non-free in Squeeze:</th><td>11</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Claimed in Squeeze:</th><td>2</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Delayed in Squeeze:</th><td>8</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Can fixed in a security Update:</th><td>12</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Otherwise fixed in Squeeze:</th><td>21</td></tr>
</table>

<p>Ignoring all the above (multiple tags possible), <b>121</b>
bugs need to be fixed by Debian Contributers to get Debian 6.0 <q>Squeeze</q> released.</p>

<p>However, with the view of the Release Managers, <b>271</b> need
to be dealt with for the release to happen.</p>

<p>Please see <a
href="http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/releasing-squeeze-6">my older
post</a> for an explanation of the different numbers.

      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/rc-stats/2010-32?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Playing further with numbers</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/what-is-an-active-dd-2</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/what-is-an-active-dd-2</comments-->
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:52:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/what-is-an-active-dd-2</guid>
      <description>
              
If I count correctly, <a href="http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2009/10/01">Christan's first
statistic</a> listed exactly 990 active accounts.  The
<a href="http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2010/08/07#devel-countries-2010">new
one</a> just 873.  That's a difference of 117.  Which is by coincidence
exactly the number of <a href="https://nm.debian.org/dm_list.html">active
Debian Maintainers</a> (people with limited upload rights, who don't have
an account on our servers).</p>

<p>So an other argument, that we don't need to worry.  What we seem to have
lost, we gained through other ways ;)

      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/what-is-an-active-dd-2?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How an &quot;active&quot; developer is defined</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/what-is-an-active-dd</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/what-is-an-active-dd</comments-->
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:50:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/what-is-an-active-dd</guid>
      <description>
              
Apparently some people misunderstood <a
href="http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2010/08/07#devel-countries-2010">Christian's
recent statistics</a> how Debian Developers are distributed over countries
a bit.  Especially the the sentence <q>We now have 62% of active DDs while
we had 73% last year.</q> is kind of misleading, if you don't know how an
<q>active</q> developer is defined.  And especially, if you ignore the
following sentence: <b><q>This year's campaign of MIA work has been somehow
&quot;successful&quot;, apparently</q></b></p>

<p>So, let's start with the <q>active</q> developers.  To be precise:
Neither Christian (nor did I <a
href="http://blog.schmehl.info/2009/08/05#dds-per-countrie">back then</a>)
tried in any way to decide which developer is active, in the meaning of:
He is actively contributing to Debian.  That's pretty difficult data to
get.  Instead we just took the data available, and looked for <i>activated
accounts</i>.  And that's an important difference.</p>

<p>See, if an Debian Developer leaves the project, his account doesn't get
deleted (for various reasons), it just gets deactivated in our central
account setup.  So, when Christian wrote, he counted <i>active
developers</i> he basically said:  I didn't counted the deactivated
accounts.</p>

<p>So far so good.  But indeed quite a lot accounts got disabled last year.
Is that a bad sign (as some journalist say)?  Actually no.  As it's quite
complex to check, who's still using his account (see <a
href="http://wiki.debian.org/MIA">http://wiki.debian.org/MIA</a> for some
explanation), it is quite possible for someone to still have his account
active, who isn't using it.  During the last year many of these
<q>Karteileichen</q> (nominal members, if you will) have been deactivated
(after being pinged several times).</p>

<p>Or, to write it this way:  While indeed quite some accounts have been
disabled, Debian hasn't lost much through at, as these account's weren't
used!

      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/what-is-an-active-dd?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Release Critical Bug report for Week 31</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-31</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-31</comments-->
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian/rc-stats</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-31</guid>
      <description>
              
The <a href="http://bts.turmzimmer.net/">unofficial rc bug tracker</a>
currently knows about the following bugs:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>In Total:</th><td>433</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Affecting Squeeze:</th><td>314</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Squeeze only:</th><td>69</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Remaining to be fixed in Squeeze:</th><td><b>245</b></td></tr>
</table>

<p>Of these <b>245</b> bugs, the following tags are set:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>Pending in Squeeze:</th><td>18</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Patched in Squeeze:</th><td>45</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Duplicates in Squeeze:</th><td>28</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Contrib or non-free in Squeeze:</th><td>10</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Claimed in Squeeze:</th><td>2</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Delayed in Squeeze:</th><td>7</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Can fixed in a security Update:</th><td>9</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Otherwise fixed in Squeeze:</th><td>32</td></tr>
</table>

<p>Ignoring all the above (multiple tags possible), <b>145</b>
bugs need to be fixed by Debian Contributers to get Debian 6.0 <q>Squeeze</q> released.</p>

<p>However, with the view of the Release Managers, <b>220</b> need
to be dealt with for the release to happen.</p>

<p>Please see <a
href="http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/releasing-squeeze-6">my older
post</a> for an explanation of the different numbers.

      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/rc-stats/2010-31?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DDs, please feel free to commit to the DPN directly</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/dpn-helping-is-easy</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/dpn-helping-is-easy</comments-->
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 16:41:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/dpn-helping-is-easy</guid>
      <description>
              
The svn repository used to draft the Debian Project News just passed the
sixth hundreds commit.  If my calculations are correct, that's quite
more than the number of edits done, back when the DPN was drafted in the
wiki.  I take it as a hint, that the new work flow works better than the
old one.</p>

<p>However, playing a bit with statistics (done by horrible shell one
liners ;)
I noticed, that - while every Debian Developer may commit to
the subversion repository - not that many commits from other DDs where
made: Of the 602 commits so far, only 70 where done by other DDs:</p>

<pre>
alex@melusine:~$ svn log --xml svn://svn.debian.org/svn/publicity \
|xmlstarlet sel -t -m "/log/logentry/author" -v "concat(.,' ')" | \
sed -e "s/ /\n/g"|sort|uniq -c|sort -n|grep -v guest|grep -v tolimar
      1
      1 abe
      1 hertzog
      1 holger
      1 mika
      1 paravoid
      2 pabs
      3 alfie
     15 zobel
     20 gio
     25 spaillard
</pre>

<p>To give credit where credit is due, here are the guest commits:</p>

<pre>
     16 tpeteul-guest
     21 jeremiah-guest
     25 gmascellani-guest
     36 madamezou-guest
    122 taffit-guest
</pre>

<p>Many thanks so far, but I would like to advertise the Debian Project News and invite every DD
to help us and to commit directly.  It's quite easy:</p>

<p>Run <tt>svn co
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/publicity/dpn/en/current</tt>, edit
the index.wml file, and then commit your changes back to the repository.
(Well, ideally you would also honor <tt>Status</tt> flag and won't commit, if
it's not <tt>open-for-edit</tt>.)</p>

<p>As for the format:  While we indeed use wml, you just need some basic
HTML knowledge.  To add a paragraph just use the following with proper
content:</p>

<pre>
&lt;a name=&quot;X&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Fancy title&lt;/h2&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More details about the topic.&lt;/p&gt;
</pre>

<p>Usually the articles are kind of sorted by importance, so unless you are
pretty sure it might be the easiest to just add your article at the end
of the regular news, just before the <i>other news</i> sections.</p>

<p>Should you not be able to fill an entire paragraph, feel free to just a
one or two sentences to the <i>other news</i> section (just add a
<tt>&lt;p&gt;...&lt;/p&gt;</tt> with your content to the end of the
<i>other news</i>).</p>

<p>Don't worry about style, your English or syntax:  It won't end up on the
web page directly, it's reviewed and checked, so you can't do anything
wrong.</p>

<p>More details are available in the wiki at <a
href="http://wiki.debian.org/ProjectNews/HowToContribute">http://wiki.debian.org/ProjectNews/HowToContribute</a>.
 Feel free to ask any questions unanswered on the publicity list at
debian-publicity@lists.debian.org.  Feel also
free to contact us there, if you would like to help by translations or
reviews.  The more people help, the less work it's for everyone :)</p>


<p>If you are not a Debian Developer, but still would like to help us, it's
no problem.  All you need is an account on our Alioth System (very easy
to get, you just need to ask) and request to join the <i>publicity</i>
project.  See <a
href="http://wiki.debian.org/ProjectNews/HowToContribute#Becominganeditoryourself">http://wiki.debian.org/ProjectNews/HowToContribute#Becominganeditoryourself</a> for the respective links.


      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/dpn-helping-is-easy?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DebConf gone Web 2.0</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/events/DebConf10/debconf-gone-web-2.0</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/events/DebConf10/debconf-gone-web-2.0</comments-->
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 09:20:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian/events/DebConf10</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/events/DebConf10/debconf-gone-web-2.0</guid>
      <description>
              
For those of us, who can't attend <a
href="http://debconf10.debconf.org">this years Debian Conference</a> might
be interesting, that thanks to valesio you can also participate via <a
href="http://debianart.org/live/">http://debianart.org/live/</a>.</p>

<p>You need either a HTML5 capable browser or Java.</p>

<p>Also many thanks to the video team for the very nice streams!

      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/events/DebConf10/debconf-gone-web-2.0?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Release Critical Bug report for Week 30</title>
      <link>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-30</link>
      <!--comments>http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-30</comments-->
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (alexander@schmehl.info)</dc:creator>
      <category domain="http://blog.schmehl.info">/Debian/rc-stats</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/rc-stats/2010-30</guid>
      <description>
              
The <a href="http://bts.turmzimmer.net/">unofficial rc bug tracker</a>
currently knows about the following bugs:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>In Total:</th><td>433</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Affecting Squeeze:</th><td>328</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Squeeze only:</th><td>74</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Remaining to be fixed in Squeeze:</th><td><b>254</b></td></tr>
</table>

<p>Of these <b>254</b> bugs, the following tags are set:</p>

<table>
  <tr><th>Pending in Squeeze:</th><td>21</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Patched in Squeeze:</th><td>41</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Duplicates in Squeeze:</th><td>20</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Contrib or non-free in Squeeze:</th><td>12</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Claimed in Squeeze:</th><td>0</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Delayed in Squeeze:</th><td>7</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Can fixed in a security Update:</th><td>17</td></tr>
  <tr><th>Otherwise fixed in Squeeze:</th><td>25</td></tr>
</table>

<p>Ignoring all the above (multiple tags possible), <b>150</b>
bugs need to be fixed by Debian Contributers to get Debian 6.0 <q>Squeeze</q> released.</p>

<p>However, with the view of the Release Managers, <b>238</b> need
to be dealt with for the release to happen.</p>

<p>Please see <a
href="http://blog.schmehl.info/Debian/releasing-squeeze-6">my older
post</a> for an explanation of the different numbers.

      </description>

<!--wfw:commentRSS>http://blog.schmehl.info/comments/Debian/rc-stats/2010-30?flav=rss2</wfw:commentRSS-->
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
